Price setting and price architecture
Most large price lists are built on cost-plus formulas and adjusted by hand. Premium products end up priced like commodities, and every customer gets the same logic.
Read on ↓Ranges have grown through acquisitions and launches. Many businesses now manage tens of thousands of prices across several legacy systems.
Marketplaces and price transparency let customers compare trade prices instantly, pulling prices down wherever there is no clear structure to defend them.
Cost-plus leaves margin unclaimed wherever a customer would pay more, and prices too high where the product competes on price. Margin is lost in one place and volume in another, and neither shows in the reports.
Launch prices set on cost-plus are rarely recovered. The first price a customer sees becomes the reference for every later negotiation.
Rebuilding a price list across a large range means repricing product families one at a time, testing each with the sales team and managing customer reaction. Without a method, the work stalls after the first few categories.
In the worked example below, a 1% change in realised price moves EBIT further than the same change in volume or cost.
Source: Pricing Insight worked example.
Relevant work: Bunzl replaced cost-plus pricing across 18,000 SKUs, with +800bps gross margin on targeted SKUs, A$5.7m EBIT and 98.3% of customers retained (realised).
A first conversation establishes how this applies in your business and whether a diagnostic is warranted.